BREAKING
BOMBSHELL: Kamala Harris Gets Caught Plagiarizing
As the 2024 election approaches, Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris is again in hot water—this time for plagiarism. Harris, already under scrutiny for her lackluster leadership as Vice President, is accused of lifting significant portions of her 2009 book Smart on Crime from other sources without proper attribution. This revelation could serve as a critical blow to her already fragile campaign.
Renowned “plagiarism hunter” Stefan Weber uncovered that Harris plagiarized at least a dozen sections in her book, pulling text from press releases, Wikipedia, news reports, and academic sources. Christopher Rufo, the investigative journalist who first reported the allegations, highlighted the severity of these transgressions, saying, “Harris not only copied material without proper attribution but relied on low-quality sources that undermine the credibility of her work.”
Rufo’s findings have ignited a firestorm, with many seizing this opportunity to highlight Harris as a fraud.
Harris’s book Smart on Crime, co-authored with Joan O’C. Hamilton was supposed to establish her credibility on criminal justice reform. Instead, it is another example of the Vice President’s tendency to cut corners and avoid responsibility. In one of the most egregious examples, Harris reportedly lifted passages directly from a press release by John Jay College of Criminal Justice, passing them off as her insights. “When you’re a public figure, people expect you to do your homework. This is a clear failure to deliver on that expectation,” Rufo remarked.
The response has been swift and biting. Former President Donald Trump’s campaign blasted Harris, calling the border czar “dishonest,” with Trump himself commenting, “Kamala Harris didn’t even write her book—what else is she lying about?” Donald Trump Jr. echoed this sentiment on social media, calling Harris’s actions “another clear example of her fraudulent nature.” “If she can’t even write her book, how can we trust her to write our laws?” he added, emphasizing the implications of her actions for her political career.
Harris’ political career was full of questionable decisions and shaky ethics, from her time as California’s Attorney General to her tenure as Vice President. Her rhetoric often sounds more like empty platitudes than genuine leadership, and her reliance on plagiarized material only solidifies what many on the right have long suspected: Kamala Harris lacks authenticity and integrity. This news is far from the first time a high-ranking Democrat has been caught stealing ideas.
President Joe Biden himself famously bowed out of the 1988 presidential race after being caught plagiarizing speeches from British Labour leader Neil Kinnock. “It seems that dishonesty runs in the family,” remarked former White House advisor Kellyanne Conway.
The Democrats’ attempts to sweep this scandal under the rug are telling. Harris’s publisher, Chronicle Books, is reportedly in “damage control mode,” with internal emails revealing that inquiries regarding the plagiarism allegations are sent to higher-ups. “They know this is a serious issue, and they’re scrambling to limit the fallout,” a source close to the publisher disclosed. Democrats hope to minimize the damage, but as Election Day approaches, voters demand answers.
With the election less than a month away, this plagiarism scandal could have serious ramifications for Harris’s campaign. Voters have already been questioning her qualifications for the presidency, and now they’re faced with even more evidence that she is not the trustworthy leader she claims to be. In a statement, Harris’s campaign dismissed the allegations, blaming them on “right-wing operatives” desperate to tarnish her image. However, this defense rings hollow when the evidence is bare for all to see.
Harris’s critics have also pointed to her inconsistent record on criminal justice reform as evidence of her duplicity. “She talks a big game about reform, but her actions in office tell a different story,” noted Senator Ted Cruz. “It’s hard to trust someone who can’t even own up to their own words.” The juxtaposition of Harris’s rhetoric against her past actions as Attorney General raises further questions about her integrity.
This latest revelation only further reinforces what the people knew all along: Kamala Harris is a fraud, unfit for the presidency, and willing to deceive the American people to get ahead.
As the nation prepares to head to the polls on November 5th, one thing is clear—Kamala Harris cannot lead the country. “If she can’t take accountability for her writing, how can we trust her to take accountability for our country?” questioned Fox News host Laura Ingraham.
This plagiarism scandal is the latest in a series of deceptions, and the people deserve better. As Harris scrambles to defend her reputation, voters wonder how much of her campaign narrative is rooted in authenticity and how much is a façade.
BREAKING: Barron Trump Gets Denied A Bank Account After…

The Trump family continues to face an alarming barrage of hostility and exclusion in the aftermath of Donald Trump’s presidency, as Melania Trump reveals in her new memoir, Melania.
The former first lady highlights how she and her son, Barron, were victimized by the divisiveness pushed by the left, which fired the far-left’s cancel culture to new heights. The most shocking revelation? Barron Trump, merely a teenager at the time, was denied the right to open a bank account, an act Melania views as politically motivated and part of a larger effort to punish the family for their political ties.
In her memoir, Melania recounts, “I was shocked and dismayed to learn that my long-time bank decided to terminate my account and deny my son the opportunity to open a new one.” This experience illustrates the alarming lengths individuals and institutions will go to uphold a politically charged agenda. The former first lady emphasizes that this situation reflects a broader trend of discrimination against her family, tied directly to their political affiliations.
Melania calls this growing hostility a manifestation of the “cancel mob,” a group intent on silencing dissenting voices. This mob doesn’t just operate on social media; it infiltrates various sectors of society, including financial institutions. The decision to deny Barron an account is a troubling example of how political ideology can impact even the most mundane aspects of life.
Furthermore, Melania sheds light on the obstacles she has faced in her charitable endeavors. After leaving the White House, she launched the Fostering the Future initiative to support children in foster care. However, she reveals that a tech education company withdrew from a partnership when they learned of her involvement.
“Despite my efforts to focus solely on children’s education, the school remained firm and terminated the agreement,” she notes. This reaction showcases how cancel culture has permeated charitable organizations, prioritizing ideology over community welfare.
The hypocrisy of the left is glaringly evident in these situations. While they often portray themselves as champions of civil rights, they simultaneously engage in actions that undermine the very communities they claim to support.
“It has been troubling to witness people who claim to care about the well-being of communities engage in actions that harm those communities,” Melania argues, revealing the double standards that often govern political discourse.
Moreover, Melania’s reflections on her post-White House life expose a society increasingly polarized by political hatred. She emphasizes that the cancel culture movement has implications that extend beyond the Trump family, as countless individuals are targeted for their beliefs. “People who claim to fight for equality and inclusion are the very ones engaging in exclusion,” she writes, pointing out the contradictions inherent in the left’s actions.
The repercussions of this cancel culture are profound, as it undermines civil discourse and promotes division. Melania warns that the “cancel mob” now includes powerful entities like corporations and media outlets, further silencing conservative voices.
The relentless pursuit of ideological conformity has fostered an environment where dissent is met with hostility.
Reflecting on the treatment of her family, Melania states, “The cancellation continues,” emphasizing the ongoing nature of this struggle.
The left’s focus on January 6 has been particularly damaging, as it has been weaponized against Donald Trump and his family, turning their lives into a political battleground.
Melania’s story serves as a wake-up call for those who value freedom and individual rights. The current landscape of cancel culture poses a significant threat to the foundational principles of democracy. If left unchecked, this trend could create an even deeper divide in American society, making it more challenging to engage in meaningful dialogue.
Ultimately, Melania Trump’s memoir illuminates the personal toll of cancel culture on her family, serving as a broader commentary on the state of political discourse in America. As she poignantly concludes, “The current socio-political landscape in the United States is disheartening.”
MUST SEE: Obama Admits That “Brothas” Are Not Turning Out…

Barack Obama, the once-celebrated first Black president of the United States, recently made a shocking admission about the lack of support for Comrade Kamala Harris from Black male voters.
During a private event with Democratic leaders, Obama confessed that the “brothas” aren’t showing up for Harris the way they did for him.
This surprising revelation has sparked heated political debate, but for many, it comes as no surprise.
“The brothas aren’t turning out for Kamala the way they did for me,” Obama reportedly said, according to insiders. His comments cast a spotlight on a growing divide within the deranged Democrats, especially as Commie Kamala faces the challenge of getting key voter groups fired up for any future campaigns.
This shouldn’t shock anyone, least of all Obama. His time in office was marked by betrayals of the Black community—particularly Black men.
Despite his rhetoric of hope and change, Obama turned his back on the very people who propelled him to the White House, leaving Black Americans, especially men, disillusioned. Kamala, now in the spotlight, is following a similar script, maintaining policies that keep Black men locked behind bars and further alienating this critical voting bloc.
Critics have long noted that Commie Kamala, as California’s attorney general, upheld policies that disproportionately affected Black men. From enforcing lengthy prison sentences to supporting the infamous three-strikes law, her record speaks volumes about her stance on the issues that matter most to the Black community. Is it any wonder Black men aren’t flocking to support her now?
Obama’s confession underscores what many of us already knew: the Democraps lost touch with the people it claims to champion. Black male voters rallied for Obama because they believed in the promise of real change. But after years of disappointment, they now see through the empty platitudes. Kamala the Unqualified, like Obama, offers more of the same—just with a different face.
Political strategists are already scrambling to address Obama’s remarks. One Democratic insider noted, “This is a serious problem for Harris. If she can’t rally Black male voters, it’s going to be very tough for her to build the coalition she needs for future success.” But it’s not just about votes—it’s about trust, or rather, the lack of it.
Let’s not forget that Obama’s tenure left many Black men behind, stuck in cycles of poverty, incarceration, and disenfranchisement. And now, Airhead Harris, the supposed beacon of diversity, has done little to break that cycle. Instead of addressing the systemic issues that plague Black men, she’s doubled down on policies that perpetuate their struggles.
It’s no wonder that Black men, the “brothas” Obama mentioned, are staying home. They see Kamala for what she is—a politician who, like her predecessor, talks the talk but fails to walk the walk. The Black community knows who’s really in their corner, and it’s not Kamala.
One Black voter on X said it plainly: “I don’t find Obama likable and many Black men that I know feel that he’s arrogant and not likable in the least! They might have liked him in the past or were hopeful, but they learned real quick that he, like Harris, is fake, affluent, entitled, elitist who cannot relate to the working class or the poor!”
The corrupt Democrats have taken the Black vote for granted for far too long. Obama’s admission only proves that the cracks within the party are widening. Black men, who once enthusiastically supported Obama, now see through the facade. And Kamala Harris? She’s just another cog in the Decayed Democrat machine.
The harsh truth is that Obama, Kamala, and the Decayed Democrats at large have no moral authority to speak for Black men. They’ve abandoned them when it mattered most. And now, as Kamala grapples with low approval ratings and diminishing support, the consequences of that betrayal are becoming clear.
Obama’s confession is just the beginning. The real story is the ongoing betrayal of Black Americans by a party that claims to represent them. And with Kamala under Obama’s wings, don’t expect the “brothas” to show up anytime soon.




