BREAKING
MUST SEE: Bret Baier Reveals That The Kamala Campaign Called The Interview Early
In an episode of Special Report on Fox News, Comrade Kamala Harris found herself in an unexpected bind as her interview with Bret Baier took a disastrous turn. As Baier delved into pressing issues surrounding her policies and the Biden regime, Harris’s staff began to wave their arms frantically, signaling to end the discussion. This chaos unfolded on October 16, 2024, and the spectacle is certainly a circus act worthy of a front-row seat.
The interview was initially scheduled for 25 to 30 minutes, but Harris was 17 minutes late. By then, the stakes were high, and as Baier noted, “We were pushing the envelope to be able to turn it around.” His patience wore thin as he tried to make the most of the limited time. The desperate signaling from Harris’s team turned the interview into a frantic race against the clock, with Baier noting, “I’m talking like four people waving their hands like, ‘It’s gotta stop!’”
Baier expressed his frustration at the abrupt interruption of his questioning. “There are so many things, and maybe she should do more of these,” he remarked. Commie Kamala’s evasion of direct questions made a mark on the journalist. Instead of addressing serious issues, including her mishandling of immigration and national security, Harris attempted to pivot the conversation back to her campaign talking points. Talk about a strategic maneuver! “It’s good to meet you,” she added as if the pleasantries could mask her inability to engage substantively.
As the interview wrapped up prematurely, Baier attempted to squeeze in some final questions. “Madam Vice President, they’re wrapping me very hard here,” he stated, but Harris responded sheepishly, “I thank you for the time.” One must wonder if she was thanking him for his patience or hoping to escape a line of questioning quickly turning unfavorable.
The interview wasn’t just a train wreck for Harris; it also sparked an immediate backlash from her campaign. Senior campaign adviser David Plouffe wasted no time labeling the interview an “ambush” in a tweet just minutes after it aired. One can’t help but chuckle at the irony of claiming an ambush when Harris herself couldn’t handle the heat in the kitchen. “This is not what we signed up for,” Plouffe lamented, but maybe they should have prepared better for the tough questions.
The interview exposed that Harris and her team were less concerned about engaging with the American people and more focused on controlling the narrative. Baier described the tactics employed by Harris’s campaign as similar to “icing the kicker” — a reference to a common football strategy to unsettle the opponent just before a critical moment. “So, we were supposed to start at 5 p.m. — this was the time they gave us. We’re going to do 25 or 30 minutes,” he explained. The need for a strategy to mitigate the risk of tough questions paints a picture of a campaign in crisis mode.
In typical fashion, Harris tried to deflect the tough questions, particularly about the rising number of migrants crossing the border. When Baier asked about her administration’s permissive immigration policies, she deftly redirected the focus back to Donald Trump. “I think the American people have a concern about Donald Trump,” she declared as if her opponents’ actions could excuse her shortcomings. As if shifting the blame could somehow distract from the chaos unfolding in her party.
Throughout the interview, Harris’s attempts to dodge questions about President Biden’s cognitive decline were equally telling. When asked when she first noticed his diminishing mental faculties, she expertly avoided answering, declaring, “Joe Biden is not on the ballot.” Ah yes, let’s just ignore the elephant in the room, shall we?
As the interview concluded, one can only imagine the sigh of relief from Harris and her staff as they made their swift exit. Baier seemed outraged about the abruptness of the conclusion, stating, “I had to dismoun there at the end.” However, this incident raises questions about her ability to handle tough scrutiny as the 2024 election draws near. After all, if Harris struggles to manage a simple interview, what hope does she have in addressing the complex issues facing our nation?
The awkward ending reminds us of Harris’s ongoing struggles to articulate a clear vision for her administration. “Normally you can kind of get in on the breath,” Baier noted, suggesting that she had come into the interview with a predetermined agenda.
“Sometimes there is an effort to filibuster, to create a moment,” he added. Indeed, her campaign strategy appears more about avoiding hard truths than engaging in meaningful dialogue.
In an electoral race where transparency is crucial, Harris’s reluctance to answer direct questions might not bode well for her campaign.
As Baier pointed out, “There are so many things that people want to learn about you and your policies.” Yet, instead of providing clarity, Harris resorted to evasive tactics, further alienating potential voters.
As the vice president continues to navigate the political landscape, one thing is certain: she may want to reconsider her strategy of avoiding the tough questions and instead embrace the opportunity to engage with voters authentically. “I had so many questions left unasked,” Baier lamented, highlighting the missed opportunity for a genuine conversation.
BREAKING: Barron Trump Gets Denied A Bank Account After…
The Trump family continues to face an alarming barrage of hostility and exclusion in the aftermath of Donald Trump’s presidency, as Melania Trump reveals in her new memoir, Melania.
The former first lady highlights how she and her son, Barron, were victimized by the divisiveness pushed by the left, which fired the far-left’s cancel culture to new heights. The most shocking revelation? Barron Trump, merely a teenager at the time, was denied the right to open a bank account, an act Melania views as politically motivated and part of a larger effort to punish the family for their political ties.
In her memoir, Melania recounts, “I was shocked and dismayed to learn that my long-time bank decided to terminate my account and deny my son the opportunity to open a new one.” This experience illustrates the alarming lengths individuals and institutions will go to uphold a politically charged agenda. The former first lady emphasizes that this situation reflects a broader trend of discrimination against her family, tied directly to their political affiliations.
Melania calls this growing hostility a manifestation of the “cancel mob,” a group intent on silencing dissenting voices. This mob doesn’t just operate on social media; it infiltrates various sectors of society, including financial institutions. The decision to deny Barron an account is a troubling example of how political ideology can impact even the most mundane aspects of life.
Furthermore, Melania sheds light on the obstacles she has faced in her charitable endeavors. After leaving the White House, she launched the Fostering the Future initiative to support children in foster care. However, she reveals that a tech education company withdrew from a partnership when they learned of her involvement.
“Despite my efforts to focus solely on children’s education, the school remained firm and terminated the agreement,” she notes. This reaction showcases how cancel culture has permeated charitable organizations, prioritizing ideology over community welfare.
The hypocrisy of the left is glaringly evident in these situations. While they often portray themselves as champions of civil rights, they simultaneously engage in actions that undermine the very communities they claim to support.
“It has been troubling to witness people who claim to care about the well-being of communities engage in actions that harm those communities,” Melania argues, revealing the double standards that often govern political discourse.
Moreover, Melania’s reflections on her post-White House life expose a society increasingly polarized by political hatred. She emphasizes that the cancel culture movement has implications that extend beyond the Trump family, as countless individuals are targeted for their beliefs. “People who claim to fight for equality and inclusion are the very ones engaging in exclusion,” she writes, pointing out the contradictions inherent in the left’s actions.
The repercussions of this cancel culture are profound, as it undermines civil discourse and promotes division. Melania warns that the “cancel mob” now includes powerful entities like corporations and media outlets, further silencing conservative voices.
The relentless pursuit of ideological conformity has fostered an environment where dissent is met with hostility.
Reflecting on the treatment of her family, Melania states, “The cancellation continues,” emphasizing the ongoing nature of this struggle.
The left’s focus on January 6 has been particularly damaging, as it has been weaponized against Donald Trump and his family, turning their lives into a political battleground.
Melania’s story serves as a wake-up call for those who value freedom and individual rights. The current landscape of cancel culture poses a significant threat to the foundational principles of democracy. If left unchecked, this trend could create an even deeper divide in American society, making it more challenging to engage in meaningful dialogue.
Ultimately, Melania Trump’s memoir illuminates the personal toll of cancel culture on her family, serving as a broader commentary on the state of political discourse in America. As she poignantly concludes, “The current socio-political landscape in the United States is disheartening.”
MUST SEE: Obama Admits That “Brothas” Are Not Turning Out…
Barack Obama, the once-celebrated first Black president of the United States, recently made a shocking admission about the lack of support for Comrade Kamala Harris from Black male voters.
During a private event with Democratic leaders, Obama confessed that the “brothas” aren’t showing up for Harris the way they did for him.
This surprising revelation has sparked heated political debate, but for many, it comes as no surprise.
“The brothas aren’t turning out for Kamala the way they did for me,” Obama reportedly said, according to insiders. His comments cast a spotlight on a growing divide within the deranged Democrats, especially as Commie Kamala faces the challenge of getting key voter groups fired up for any future campaigns.
This shouldn’t shock anyone, least of all Obama. His time in office was marked by betrayals of the Black community—particularly Black men.
Despite his rhetoric of hope and change, Obama turned his back on the very people who propelled him to the White House, leaving Black Americans, especially men, disillusioned. Kamala, now in the spotlight, is following a similar script, maintaining policies that keep Black men locked behind bars and further alienating this critical voting bloc.
Critics have long noted that Commie Kamala, as California’s attorney general, upheld policies that disproportionately affected Black men. From enforcing lengthy prison sentences to supporting the infamous three-strikes law, her record speaks volumes about her stance on the issues that matter most to the Black community. Is it any wonder Black men aren’t flocking to support her now?
Obama’s confession underscores what many of us already knew: the Democraps lost touch with the people it claims to champion. Black male voters rallied for Obama because they believed in the promise of real change. But after years of disappointment, they now see through the empty platitudes. Kamala the Unqualified, like Obama, offers more of the same—just with a different face.
Political strategists are already scrambling to address Obama’s remarks. One Democratic insider noted, “This is a serious problem for Harris. If she can’t rally Black male voters, it’s going to be very tough for her to build the coalition she needs for future success.” But it’s not just about votes—it’s about trust, or rather, the lack of it.
Let’s not forget that Obama’s tenure left many Black men behind, stuck in cycles of poverty, incarceration, and disenfranchisement. And now, Airhead Harris, the supposed beacon of diversity, has done little to break that cycle. Instead of addressing the systemic issues that plague Black men, she’s doubled down on policies that perpetuate their struggles.
It’s no wonder that Black men, the “brothas” Obama mentioned, are staying home. They see Kamala for what she is—a politician who, like her predecessor, talks the talk but fails to walk the walk. The Black community knows who’s really in their corner, and it’s not Kamala.
One Black voter on X said it plainly: “I don’t find Obama likable and many Black men that I know feel that he’s arrogant and not likable in the least! They might have liked him in the past or were hopeful, but they learned real quick that he, like Harris, is fake, affluent, entitled, elitist who cannot relate to the working class or the poor!”
The corrupt Democrats have taken the Black vote for granted for far too long. Obama’s admission only proves that the cracks within the party are widening. Black men, who once enthusiastically supported Obama, now see through the facade. And Kamala Harris? She’s just another cog in the Decayed Democrat machine.
The harsh truth is that Obama, Kamala, and the Decayed Democrats at large have no moral authority to speak for Black men. They’ve abandoned them when it mattered most. And now, as Kamala grapples with low approval ratings and diminishing support, the consequences of that betrayal are becoming clear.
Obama’s confession is just the beginning. The real story is the ongoing betrayal of Black Americans by a party that claims to represent them. And with Kamala under Obama’s wings, don’t expect the “brothas” to show up anytime soon.
