HOLY CRAP: Melinda Gates is Urging Husband Bill Gates To Answer..

Melinda French Gates has publicly stated that her ex-husband, Bill Gates, needs to answer lingering questions about his ties to the late Jeffrey Epstein.

During a recent NPR interview, she expressed “unbelievable sadness” over allegations emerging from newly released Epstein files, but she pointedly directed inquiries toward Bill and others involved.

For conservatives, this comes as no surprise. Many have long suspected that powerful figures like Gates evade accountability while ordinary Americans face the full force of the law.

Conservative media outlets immediately seized on Melinda’s comments as evidence that even those closest to Gates are distancing themselves from the scandal.

The Washington Times reported that Melinda described the document release as bringing back painful memories, emphasizing that “whatever questions remain there … those questions are for those people and for even my ex-husband.”

Her refusal to defend Bill underscores a growing narrative on the right that the billionaire philanthropist has much to explain about his repeated meetings with a convicted sex offender.

Fox News highlighted Melinda’s desire to move on, quoting her as saying she’s “happy to be away from all the muck” associated with the Epstein allegations.

Conservatives interpret this as self-preservation, benefiting from the Gates fortune while avoiding the controversy. It’s a classic case of the liberal elite protecting their own until it’s no longer convenient.

Breitbart took a sharper tone, portraying Melinda’s remarks as effectively throwing Bill under the bus. The outlet noted her description of the allegations as “horrific,” including bizarre claims involving surreptitious antibiotics, and her insistence that Bill “needs to answer” for them. Many see this as a crack in the carefully curated public image of the Gates family, who have long promoted globalist agendas through their foundation.

Newsmax echoed these sentiments, reporting Melinda’s “unbelievable sadness” for victims while emphasizing her stance that remaining questions are Bill’s responsibility. This aligns with conservative critiques that figures like Gates, who hobnob with world leaders, should not receive special treatment.

In a follow-up, Fox News quoted Bill Gates admitting his meetings with Epstein were “foolish,” an acknowledgment conservatives dismiss as too little, too late. Melinda’s interview, directing questions to Bill, only fuels right-wing calls for accountability.

Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.), a vocal advocate for Epstein victims, has amplified Melinda’s statements in her push for Gates to testify under oath.

Newsmax covered Mace’s demand, noting that even Gates’ ex-wife won’t defend him, reinforcing the conservative principle that no one—including billionaires—gets a “free pass.”

The Daily Wire resurfaced Melinda’s 2022 comments linking Gates’ Epstein ties to their divorce. Conservatives see the new files as validation of long-held suspicions, proving that media and Democrats have shielded powerful allies from scrutiny.

On X, conservative users quickly reacted:

• @sally_sneddon wrote: “YOU MEAN SHE DIDN’T KNOW ANYTHING?!?!?! ‘Unbelievable sadness’ – Melinda French Gates responds to Bill Gates claims in latest Epstein files.”
• @SmindCrypto added: “Melinda Gates didn’t just decline to defend Bill; she handed him the bill … Accountability isn’t a ‘tantrum’—it’s the price of entry for power.”
• @ToscaAusten observed: “Melinda doesn’t deny a single allegation—just says it’s ‘sad’ … If the allegations were fabricated, she’d say so directly.”
• @4DustyOldMan labeled her reaction “SELFISH,” arguing she benefited from Bill’s wealth and should have exposed issues earlier.

The broader Epstein saga continues to expose what conservatives call a web of corruption among the powerful. Fox News reported on the Clintons agreeing to depositions, contrasting it with Gates’ situation and noting Melinda’s distancing remarks as a sign that the tide is turning against elite impunity.

Conservatives argue Gates’ repeated denials lack credibility. The Washington Times highlighted that Gates has claimed no wrongdoing, but multiple visits to Epstein’s properties raise serious questions demanding sworn testimony. Breitbart emphasized the “horrific” nature of the claims, including alleged medical experiments, aligning with conservative fears of unchecked billionaire influence in health and science.

Newsmax’s coverage reiterated Melinda’s stance that questions are for Bill, while spotlighting Mace’s congressional push. Conservatives view this as a necessary use of oversight to hold the wealthy accountable.

The release of the Epstein files has reignited scrutiny of Gates’ foundation work, with some questioning whether his Epstein connections influenced global health initiatives.

On X, grassroots conservative anger is evident, demanding Gates testify to clear the air—or face consequences. Users emphasize that power without accountability breeds corruption, and Melinda’s non-denial is seen as tacit confirmation. The Gates Foundation, frequently criticized by the right for its global health and population control initiatives, remains under the microscope.

As Rep. Mace leads the charge, conservatives hope this pressure will force Gates into the spotlight. Comparisons with other Epstein associates, like the Clintons facing depositions, highlight what the right sees as Gates’ undue protection, possibly tied to political connections.

Melinda’s interview, described by Breitbart as placing her in a “beautiful place” post-divorce, is viewed by conservatives as opportunistic detachment. Fox News’ broader investigation into Epstein’s network signals that elite Democrats and figures like Gates may finally face overdue scrutiny.

The Daily Wire reminds readers that Melinda first linked Epstein to the divorce years ago, suggesting a pattern of evasion.

BREAKING: Anna Paulina Luna Claims The Biden DOJ DESTROYED…

Representative Anna Paulina Luna has leveled explosive information against the Biden Department of Justice, claiming that critical materials related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation have been deliberately destroyed.

Luna, who chairs a congressional task force focused on federal transparency, has stated unequivocally that she possesses evidence implicating high-ranking officials in the DOJ.

She introduced legislation titled the SHRED Act, aimed at imposing severe penalties on government agents who destroy or conceal federal records. The proposed bill calls for 20 years to life in prison for anyone caught eliminating evidence in cases of national significance.

“Even if they are conducting a criminal investigation, you should probably pick up the phone and call us,” Luna told Fox News. “We have been more than patient.”

These developments come amid growing conservative suspicion that the Biden administration has no interest in unmasking Epstein’s full network. The notion that key records could be gone forever only intensifies fears that justice is being buried under a bureaucratic rug.

Luna’s office has reportedly sent multiple requests to the Department of Justice demanding clarity on the handling of Epstein-related materials. So far, those inquiries have been met with either vague responses or complete silence.

The congresswoman did not mince words in her public statements, suggesting that the DOJ’s behavior constitutes a deliberate act of obstruction. If true, such actions could violate federal law and trigger an entirely new legal battle.

“The Biden DOJ has obstructed Congress, ignored subpoenas, and now appears to have destroyed critical evidence,” Luna said. “This is corruption at the highest level.”

Critics argue that this is yet another example of double standards in Washington. “Had this been a Republican-led DOJ accused of destroying documents in a child sex trafficking case, the media would be apoplectic,” one conservative commentator noted.

For years, the Epstein case has symbolized the deep rot within America’s elite circles. The financier’s suspicious death in prison and the subsequent lack of high-profile indictments have fueled accusations of a widespread cover-up.

Now, Luna’s allegations breathe new life into those concerns. If records were indeed destroyed, the implications are profound. It would mean that the DOJ, under Biden, actively shielded criminals from justice.

What’s more troubling is that these destroyed materials could have named prominent individuals—politicians, celebrities, and global financiers—who participated in or enabled Epstein’s crimes.

In this context, Luna’s SHRED Act isn’t just legislative symbolism. It is a clarion call for accountability in an era marked by elite impunity. Her bill seeks to ensure that future officials think twice before erasing truth from the historical record.

Despite Luna’s repeated calls for transparency, there has been no formal response from Attorney General Merrick Garland. The silence speaks volumes to many who believe the DOJ is stonewalling on purpose.

Meanwhile, conservative lawmakers have rallied behind Luna. A growing number of Republicans in the House and Senate are voicing support for investigations into the DOJ’s handling of Epstein evidence.

Some have even floated the idea of appointing a special counsel to probe the matter independently. Given the stakes, such a move may be the only path forward to restore public confidence.

This latest scandal further erodes the credibility of an already battered Department of Justice. From the Hunter Biden laptop fiasco to the political targeting of conservatives, the agency has been repeatedly accused of partisanship.

Now, with Epstein documents allegedly destroyed, the DOJ’s credibility is in tatters. Public trust, once broken, is hard to rebuild.

The American people deserve the truth. And if Luna’s allegations are accurate, they deserve justice, no matter how high the guilty parties sit.

BREAKING: Tom Homan Reveals an Investigation is Underway Into AOC For…

Border Czar Tom Homan confirmed that a federal investigation is underway into Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for allegedly employing a criminal illegal alien and helping others evade federal immigration authorities.

Speaking from his post as one of President Trump’s top immigration officials, Homan revealed that ICE has launched a formal probe after multiple allegations emerged against the congresswoman.

“This is a live federal investigation. We’ve asked ICE to take immediate action,” Homan said during a televised interview.

The individual in question is reportedly an undocumented alien with a criminal record, unlawfully hired by AOC’s office.

According to internal reports, the employee had multiple encounters with law enforcement and should have been deported years ago.

Homan stressed that AOC’s potential interference with ICE operations could amount to obstruction of justice.

“This goes beyond hiring an illegal alien. There’s evidence she actively helped shield this person from deportation,” he stated.

Conservative leaders are sounding the alarm, warning that this may be only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to far-left officials flouting immigration laws.

AOC has long been known for championing sanctuary cities and attacking border agents, often labeling them as “racist” and “oppressors.”

Now, critics say her reckless rhetoric has crossed over into potentially criminal behavior.

“If a sitting congresswoman used her office to harbor an illegal alien, that’s a clear violation of federal law,” Homan declared.

Sources inside ICE say agents have already gathered documentation and begun interviewing individuals connected to the case.

House Republicans are demanding accountability, with several calling for a formal ethics investigation into her conduct.

“This is what happens when radicals gain power. They think the law doesn’t apply to them,” said Rep. Andy Biggs.

Democrats quickly circled the wagons, accusing Homan of launching a political smear campaign.

But Homan stood firm, reminding the public that the law is the law and political office offers no immunity from prosecution.

“This isn’t about politics. It’s about national security and public trust,” he said.

Homan emphasized that ICE agents are working independently and that the White House is not interfering in the investigation.

“We are following the facts. If those facts point to criminal activity, then action will be taken,” Homan confirmed.

Legal experts say AOC could face charges ranging from unlawful employment to obstruction of federal agents, depending on the evidence.

Citizens outraged by the news are demanding swift justice and a full public accounting of the congresswoman’s actions.

Homan urged Americans not to let political ideology blind them to the seriousness of the allegations.

“We must restore the rule of law,” he concluded. “No one, no matter how powerful, is above it.”

BREAKING: The FBI Launches Criminal Investigation Into..

It’s finally happening.

John Brennan and James Comey—two of the most powerful Obama-era intelligence chiefs—are now facing criminal investigations.

Their role in pushing the fabricated Trump-Russia collusion narrative derailed a presidency and deceived the nation.

Sources inside the Justice Department confirm that former CIA Director Brennan is under investigation for allegedly lying to Congress.

Ex-FBI Director Comey is also the subject of an ongoing probe.

Their roles in the origin and manipulation of the Trump-Russia hoax are being scrutinized, years after millions of Americans demanded accountability.

Brennan is accused of pushing the phony Steele dossier into official intelligence assessments.

CIA Russia experts warned the document was so flawed it didn’t meet even “the most basic tradecraft standards.”

“Jasmine Crockett didn’t just insult Trump,” Leavitt said during her White House briefing. “She smeared over 70 million Americans who believe in freedom, God, secure borders, and the Constitution. Calling them mentally ill is not just false—it’s dangerous.”

Brennan ignored the warnings and formalized his demand in writing, insisting the fake dossier be included anyway.

James Comey, for his part, did the same.

The CIA’s review makes clear: FBI leadership under Comey pressured the intelligence community to embed the Steele dossier in their final report on Russian election interference.

The FBI “repeatedly pushed” for its inclusion.

These two didn’t just make bad calls. They rigged the process.

Even worse, Brennan later told Congress under oath that the Steele dossier “wasn’t part of the corpus of intelligence” used in the Russia assessment.

But a newly surfaced email shows that he pushed the dossier hard, despite being warned it could destroy the report’s credibility.

It was about kneecapping President Trump before he was even sworn in.

“This was Obama, Comey, Clapper, and Brennan deciding, ‘We’re going to screw Trump,’” former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe told the press.

“They all knew what they were doing.”

Millions of tax dollars were wasted. Reputations were destroyed.

“She’ll meet grandmothers, veterans, farmers, teachers, truckers—all proud Americans who just want their country back. These are the people she called mentally ill. What an absolute disgrace.”

And for what? To push Hillary Clinton’s opposition research as gospel truth.

Clinton and the DNC paid Fusion GPS to dig up dirt.

Fusion hired British ex-spy Christopher Steele. Steele gave them fiction.

Senator Josh Hawley demanded action: “If Brennan and Comey lied to Congress or weaponized their agencies against a political opponent, they should be prosecuted—no exceptions, no excuses.”

This scandal is bigger than Watergate.

It poisoned public trust, warped the 2016 election aftermath, and set the tone for years of baseless attacks on a sitting president.

The investigations are underway.

https://rumble.com/v6w0ygm-fbi-launches-criminal-investigations-into-brennan-comey-over-trump-russia-p.html?e9s=src_v1_clr%2Csrc_v1_ucp_a

Now the question is, will the justice system do its job, or will the same people who buried the truth for years bury it again?

Brennan and Comey must be held accountable.

No one is above the law, not even the architects of one of the most dishonest political smear campaigns in American history.

BREAKING: Joe Biden Admits to New York Times That…

Joe Biden admitted to The New York Times that he did not personally sign off on every pardon and commutation issued during his presidency, an acknowledgment that has sparked intense debate over how involved he truly was in carrying out one of the most consequential powers of the office.

“I made every decision on the categories and top-level individuals, but the mechanics were left to staff,” Biden told the Times. That sentence alone sent shockwaves through political and legal communities.

According to the New York Post, Biden’s White House Chief of Staff Jeff Zients authorized the use of the autopen to execute a sweeping set of clemency actions on January 19, 2025. This included about 2,500 pardons and 1,500 commutations.

The New York Post confirmed, “Biden admitted that he didn’t review every clemency case individually and that his chief of staff, Jeff Zients, authorized the use of the autopen.”

The same report added, “The autopen application, which Biden also used to sign some legislation, allowed staff to speed up paperwork processing.”

While Biden insisted, as quoted in ABC News, that he personally made “every decision,” he conceded that he did not individually sign off on each document, saying, “I approved each of the clemency decisions before they were issued.”

The Daily Beast quoted Biden dismissing Republican criticism: “That is utter BS,” he said, responding to allegations that he had no hand in the clemency spree.

Still, Biden’s comments confirmed the worst fears of critics who have questioned his cognitive fitness and decision-making capacity. As Time reported, the final flurry of clemency actions was conducted with Biden out of public view.

Time added context, noting, “Emails show Biden’s chief of staff, Jeff Zients, approved the use of the autopen to execute clemency documents on the president’s behalf.”

In the same article, the legal implications were underscored: “While it is legally permissible, it is extremely rare for a president to use an autopen to sign something as consequential as a clemency order.”

Republican leaders swiftly seized on the opportunity to highlight Biden’s detachment. House Oversight Chair James Comer was quoted as saying, “This isn’t just about a signature. It’s about transparency, accountability, and who really was making decisions in that White House.”

Comer continued, as cited in ABC News, “We are investigating whether this use of the autopen was a way to obscure Biden’s declining capacity and whether any of the beneficiaries had connections to the administration.”

The legal debate over autopen use isn’t new, but Biden’s large-scale application is unprecedented. According to Time, “It has never been used on this scale or for something with the constitutional gravity of a pardon.”

Even some Democrats were privately concerned. One DNC strategist, speaking anonymously to Politico, said, “It feeds the narrative that Biden isn’t all there.”

In response to concerns, the Daily Beast reported that Biden maintained, “Each recipient was vetted and met the established standards for clemency.”

This adds to a growing list of concerns among voters and lawmakers alike. ABC News reported that the clemency decisions were made with “speed and secrecy,” raising transparency questions.

Donald Trump, seizing the moment, weighed in: “He didn’t have the guts or the capacity to do his job,” he said during a recent rally, as quoted in The Daily Beast.

Trump added, “You don’t get to hide behind a machine when you’re playing with the law.”

The left will undoubtedly spin this as a necessary compromise. But don’t be fooled. They fought tooth and nail to stop this resolution. They wanted the shutdown. They wanted the leverage. They lost.

This defeat comes amid record-low approval ratings for the Biden administration and widespread discontent with the economy. Americans want change, and it’s beginning to show in how lawmakers vote.

Grassroots conservatives must seize this moment. The Republican base should rally behind those who demand accountability, transparency, and fiscal restraint. Let this vote be the first of many.

The CR vote was a step forward. Not a solution, but a start. Conservatives must keep the pressure on. We need bold leadership willing to disrupt business as usual.

Let this vote serve as a reminder: when the American people rise up, even the most entrenched institutions must listen. The days of runaway spending with zero accountability are numbered.

Democrats who oppose this tide do so at their peril. The grassroots is awake, engaged, and ready to take back our country.