HOLY SH*T: Bill Gates Admits He Had TWO…

Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates recently spoke to employees at the Gates Foundation to address long-standing questions regarding his personal conduct and past associations. During a scheduled town hall meeting, Gates confirmed he had extramarital affairs with two Russian nationals during his marriage to Melinda French Gates.

The timing of these admissions coincides with the release of extensive Department of Justice (DOJ) documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. These files have renewed public interest in the social and professional circles associated with the financier.

For several years, representatives of the “America First” movement and other political critics have requested more transparency regarding Gates’ interactions with Epstein. This week’s statements provide the first direct confirmation from Gates regarding specific vulnerabilities that Epstein reportedly attempted to exploit.

According to reports on the meeting, Gates identified the women involved as a bridge player and a nuclear physicist. He informed staff that Epstein had become aware of these relationships, which aligns with reports that Epstein later used this information in an attempt to influence or extort him.

Gates told foundation employees that his goal was to take responsibility for his past choices. He described his meetings with Epstein as a significant mistake and apologized for the negative attention these associations brought to the organization’s work.

Public skepticism remains regarding the nature of the relationship. The DOJ documents include draft communications where Epstein claimed to have assisted Gates with various personal matters. Gates’ legal team has stated these specific allegations are inaccurate, though the broader admissions have kept the topic in the news cycle.

Members of the “America First” movement have frequently argued that high-profile figures in the technology and philanthropic sectors often avoid the level of scrutiny applied to the general public. They view these admissions as evidence that the actions of the global elite require closer examination.

The personal impact of these disclosures continues to be a factor in the ongoing narrative. Melinda French Gates, who finalized her divorce from Bill Gates in 2021, previously indicated that his association with Epstein was a factor in her decision to end the marriage.

The involvement of foreign nationals, specifically a Russian physicist and a bridge player, has also led to discussions regarding security risks. Conservative analysts have noted that high-net-worth individuals are often targets for foreign influence, a point of concern for those focused on national interests.

Despite these personal disclosures, the Gates Foundation is moving forward with its long-term health and development goals. CEO Mark Suzman recently issued an update on the foundation’s 20-year strategy, even as the founder’s history remains a subject of debate.

Analysts suggest that the foundation’s reputation is now closely linked to how Gates handles these disclosures. As researchers continue to review the millions of pages in the Epstein files, the demand for a complete timeline of these interactions is likely to persist.

The release of the DOJ documents was a result of the Epstein Files Transparency Act. This legislation was intended to ensure that the details of the Epstein investigation were made available to the public, regardless of the status of the individuals mentioned.

In his address to the staff, Gates maintained that he did not witness any illegal activity during his meetings with Epstein. However, he admitted that his participation in these social events helped provide Epstein with a level of unearned credibility.

The DOJ files also contain various photographs and meeting notes. Gates explained to his staff that many of these interactions were professional in nature or related to fundraising efforts, though critics find the frequency of the meetings concerning.

The investigation into the broader Epstein network remains a priority for many lawmakers. They argue that revealing these connections is necessary for a transparent legal system and to ensure that all individuals are held to the same standards of conduct.

As of early 2026, the focus on Gates’ past indicates a shift in how the public views prominent tech figures. The Gates name is increasingly being evaluated through the lens of these recent admissions rather than just his professional achievements.

The “America First” base continues to advocate for accountability, asserting that financial status should not provide a shield from public inquiry. The push for information regarding the victims of the Epstein network remains a central part of this advocacy.

The Gates Foundation has characterized the town hall as an internal communication meant to provide clarity. However, the details regarding extortion attempts and foreign relationships have made the meeting a point of significant external interest.