LIBERAL LIES: President Trump’s White House Did NOT Break Any Rules With Iran Strike

The Trump White House is pushing back hard against CNN and top Democrat leaders after a misleading report claimed that key members of Congress were not notified about the recent military strike against Iran’s nuclear infrastructure.

The administration made it clear that bipartisan calls were placed, and Democrats were given appropriate notice before or immediately after the operation.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt took to X to blast CNN for spreading what she labeled as deliberate misinformation. “This is Fake News,” Leavitt posted.

“The White House made bipartisan courtesy calls to Congressional Leadership and spoke to @SenSchumer before the strike. @RepJeffries could not be reached until after, but he was briefed. @CNN please retract.”

The post came after CNN initially ran a story implying that President Trump’s administration had blindsided both Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries. The report triggered a wave of criticism from the Left, who seized on the opportunity to claim the President was bypassing Congressional oversight.

CNN quietly walked back portions of the article after Leavitt’s statement began gaining traction. The network admitted that Schumer had, in fact, received a courtesy call before the operation, roughly an hour ahead of the strike. Jeffries, meanwhile, was reportedly unreachable until afterward but was briefed as soon as possible.

That correction, however, didn’t stop Democrats from continuing their attacks. Jeffries publicly expressed outrage—not at Iran, which has been racing toward nuclear capability—but at the administration for not giving him more advance notice. He accused the White House of acting unilaterally and ignoring proper protocol.

Schumer also jumped into the political fray, calling for a classified briefing and complaining that the details shared with him before the strike were “insufficient.” He later told reporters that he found out more about the mission from the media than from the Trump administration itself.

These reactions have raised eyebrows among conservatives, who see the Democrats’ focus on notification timing as an intentional distraction from the real story: the successful and strategic dismantling of a major threat to global security. Rather than praise the operation, they chose to complain.

The strike, which targeted key components of Iran’s underground enrichment program, has been lauded by military analysts and foreign policy experts. It was carried out with precision, limited in scope, and sent a clear message to Tehran that the United States will not tolerate nuclear escalation under President Trump’s watch.

President Trump made the decision after receiving classified intelligence that Iran was preparing to accelerate weapons-grade uranium production. According to White House officials, the mission was timed perfectly to disrupt Iran’s timeline without escalating into a full-blown conflict.

Critics on the Left, however, are trying to spin the story into a scandal. Their fixation on procedural details, rather than the results of the strike, reveals a broader agenda: undermine the Commander in Chief at all costs, even at the expense of American strength and credibility.

This is not the first time Democrats have attempted to sow doubt over President Trump’s foreign policy decisions. From Syria to North Korea, they have routinely opposed strong action, choosing instead to prioritize diplomacy that often goes nowhere or gets manipulated by hostile regimes.

Republicans have rallied behind the President, praising his leadership and calling out the double standard. “If Biden had done this, the media would call him a hero,” said Sen. Tom Cotton. “But because it’s Trump, they look for any reason to attack him, even when he’s protecting American lives.”

The hypocrisy is glaring. Under the previous administration, unauthorized drone strikes and covert operations were conducted regularly with far less transparency. Yet the press gave President Biden a pass and even celebrated such actions as “bold” and “presidential.”

What’s happening now is a coordinated smear campaign, say conservative analysts. CNN ran with a misleading headline, top Democrats fanned the flames, and now the leftist media ecosystem is in overdrive to paint a successful mission as a failure in transparency.

Leavitt was right to call it out. The American people are tired of a press corps that acts like a Democratic Super PAC. They want truth, not spin. And in this case, the truth is simple: President Trump acted lawfully, responsibly, and decisively.

The White House has reiterated that Congress was notified through proper bipartisan channels. National Security Council spokespersons confirmed that both Schumer and Jeffries were on the courtesy list. If Jeffries didn’t answer his phone, that is not the fault of the President or his team.

Meanwhile, Iran has gone silent. The regime, which has often responded to U.S. action with fiery rhetoric, has thus far issued only vague statements. Sources believe the success and precision of the strike left them stunned and uncertain about how to respond.

The operation has received praise internationally from U.S. allies who have grown frustrated with years of Iranian defiance and deception. Israel, the UK, and France all issued statements supporting America’s right to defend itself and prevent a nuclear-armed Iran.

Still, Democrats appear more outraged by the phone call timing than by Iran’s nuclear ambitions. Their priorities are on full display, and they are not in line with national security or public safety. They are obsessed with undermining President Trump, no matter the cost.

MUST WATCH: Elon Musk Destroys Bill Gates

Elon Musk has lashed out at Bill Gates, rejecting the Microsoft co-founder’s claims that Musk’s cuts to U.S. foreign aid are jeopardizing vital global health programs. The billionaire CEO of Tesla and SpaceX is in the crosshairs of Gates, who accused Musk of endangering global health initiatives by reducing U.S. funding to the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).

Gates, who has made his mark through the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation with massive investments in global health programs, specifically HIV prevention efforts, criticized Musk’s fiscal policies in a recent statement.

He warned that Musk’s funding cuts would “endanger millions of vulnerable children worldwide.” However, Musk didn’t take kindly to these comments and fired back with a personal attack, questioning Gates’ credibility on social media.

In an explosive response, Musk tweeted, “I wouldn’t trust that guy to babysit my kids,” referring to Gates’ controversial past associations with the late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Musk was quick to point out that Gates had maintained professional ties with Epstein long after his conviction, citing their multiple meetings, which some reports suggest were even after Epstein’s arrest in 2019.

Musk’s remarks were far from a simple retort. The SpaceX founder also posted a meme on Twitter mocking Gates for his climate change agenda, ridiculing the energy investments Gates has made, which Musk claims are nowhere near as effective or innovative as the clean energy solutions Tesla continues to push forward.

Musk’s meme drew attention to Gates’ advocacy for renewable energy projects, with Musk making the case that innovation in technology, rather than government-driven funding, will ultimately be the key to solving the world’s most pressing problems.

“Once Tesla fully solves autonomy and has Optimus in volume production, anyone still holding a short position will be obliterated, even Gates,” Musk tweeted, further highlighting his confidence in Tesla’s ability to dominate the future of energy and automation.

BREAKING: Joe Biden’s Physician Called to Testify

House Republicans are demanding answers from President Joe Biden’s physician, Dr. Kevin O’Connor, over what they call a coordinated effort to cover up Biden’s cognitive decline. The Oversight Committee recently requested Dr. O’Connor’s testimony, raising serious concerns about medical transparency and political interference in presidential health assessments.

Chairman James Comer (R-KY) said the committee is investigating whether Dr. O’Connor’s refusal to recommend cognitive testing was influenced by his personal and financial ties to the Biden family. “We will not tolerate political doctors lying to the American people,” Comer said.

The probe follows Biden’s shocking withdrawal from the 2024 race after a series of televised gaffes and a disastrous debate against Donald Trump. Dr. O’Connor had publicly praised Biden’s mental sharpness just months earlier, raising questions about the honesty of those reports.

The Wall Street Journal confirmed that five top officials, including Dr. O’Connor and senior adviser Neera Tanden, have been called in for questioning. Republicans want to know why Biden’s advanced prostate cancer diagnosis was hidden until after he dropped out of the race.

Concerns have also grown about the frequency of visits by a Parkinson’s specialist to the White House, first reported in July 2024. While the White House insisted the visits were routine, investigators now believe they may signal deeper issues.

Former President Trump responded forcefully, saying, “This is the biggest medical cover-up in American political history. They knew Biden was unfit and kept lying to the country.”

Meanwhile, The Daily Beast and New York Post revealed that Dr. O’Connor may have coordinated with top aides to suppress the truth. “Biden’s handlers ran interference while his health worsened before our eyes,” one Republican aide told the press.

This investigation has become a flashpoint in the broader debate over government trust, with Americans demanding transparency. “We need the truth,” Comer stated. “The American people deserve to know who was protecting Biden and why.”

MUST SEE: This Prominent Democrat Was Allegedly in Control of The Autopen

With President Donald J. Trump back in office as the 47th President of the United States, new investigations are exposing what many call a shadow presidency under Joe Biden, where radical Democrats allegedly pulled the strings. Chief among them? Senator Elizabeth ‘Pocahontas’ Warren.

In a searing revelation, President Trump’s newly appointed AI and cryptocurrency czar, David Sacks, accused Warren of manipulating executive decisions in the Biden administration. “She controlled the autopen,” Sacks said bluntly in a Fox News interview, referring to the device used to replicate Biden’s signature on executive orders and federal documents.

Sacks explained, “Elizabeth Warren basically controlled the Biden administration’s crypto policy. She had this pathological hatred of crypto and wanted to kill the industry.” He argued that Biden’s clampdown on digital currency wasn’t just policy, it was a hit job orchestrated by Warren and carried out via the autopen, all without Biden’s direct involvement.

This bombshell arrives as President Trump reclaims the White House and vows to root out the bureaucrats and technocrats who undermined the Republic during Biden’s compromised term.

The Washington Examiner highlighted suspicious patterns in Biden-era documents: “Multiple executive orders and even pardons carried identical autopen signatures,” their report noted, citing oversight concerns raised by The Heritage Foundation. Experts warn that this points to a larger issue—who was really running the country?

Trump didn’t mince words: “The use of the autopen under Biden is the biggest scandal in American history since the rigged 2020 election,” he said.

House Oversight Chair James Comer has opened a formal investigation into the Biden White House’s abuse of the autopen. “We believe Joe Biden was mentally unfit to perform his duties, and there’s mounting evidence others, including Elizabeth Warren, Jill Biden, and even Hunter Biden—were making decisions in his name,” Comer said in a press briefing.

BREAKING: Whistleblower Comes Forward With Evidence Regarding Bidens Autopen Scandal

The lid is finally being blown off what may be the biggest scandal in American political history — and it centers around a pen.

A whistleblower has come forward with explosive allegations that the Biden White House used a mechanical autopen to sign critical documents — including controversial pardons — while President Joe Biden was reportedly unaware or cognitively incapable of making such decisions. Ed Martin, the newly appointed pardon attorney and head of President Trump’s DOJ Weaponization Working Group, is spearheading the investigation that could lead to criminal charges.

“I had a whistleblower in my office 10 days ago — senior, senior Democrat — saying, ‘Look, it was these three people that controlled access, and they were making money off of it,’” Martin revealed during an interview with journalist Mark Halperin. “I don’t know if I believe it yet, but the point is, I think, we have to get to the bottom of it for the American people and to protect the process, and that’s what we’re doing.”

The allegations center on the use of the autopen to issue pardons for high-profile figures including Anthony Fauci, Gen. Mark Milley, members of Biden’s family, and even former members of the House Jan. 6 Committee — while Biden was either on vacation or reportedly unaware of key executive decisions. According to watchdog group Oversight Project, identical machine-generated signatures were used on several major documents, raising serious concerns over who was truly running the country.

“There’s no question that Ed Martin is on the case,” said Mike Howell of the Oversight Project. “As both the pardon attorney and President Trump’s weaponization czar, he is uniquely positioned to answer the question everyone is asking — ‘Who was the president during the Biden years?’”

Martin identified a list of “gatekeepers” alleged to have wielded enormous behind-the-scenes power: former Chief of Staff Ron Klain, senior Biden adviser Anita Dunn, Obama lawyer Robert Bauer, longtime Biden operative Steve Ricchetti, and First Lady Jill Biden. According to the whistleblower, these figures controlled access to the president and, more alarmingly, were allegedly “making money” off the power vacuum.

President Trump did not mince words. Posting to Truth Social, he declared, “It was the people that knew [Biden] was cognitively impaired, and that took over the Autopen. They stole the Presidency of the United States, and put us in Great Danger.”

Calling the alleged exploiters guilty of “TREASON at the Highest Level,” Trump added, “Something very severe should happen to these Treasonous Thugs that wanted to destroy our Country, but couldn’t, because I came along.”

House Oversight Chairman Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.) confirmed his committee is launching its own probe. “We don’t believe Joe Biden knew what was going on,” said Comer. “We don’t believe that using the autopen makes these executive orders and even these pardons legal.”

Comer noted the investigation could have significant legal implications. “Hopefully, it will benefit Trump in court as he tries to do what the American people want done. And that’s drain the swamp.”

Even former Democrat insiders are speaking out. Lindy Li, a former Harris campaign surrogate and Biden fundraiser, admitted earlier this year that Hunter Biden and unelected aides were likely acting as a “shadow president” following Biden’s decline. “It was Hunter Biden, Jill Biden, and a handful of other unelected senior advisers,” Li said on the “Shawn Ryan Show.”

The implications are staggering. If true, this scandal not only points to a usurpation of presidential power, but it potentially renders dozens of executive actions and pardons illegitimate.